refers to a landmark case decided through the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. In this article’s a brief overview:

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners could look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

While there isn't any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being heard, it holds tiny sway. Still, if there is no precedent from the home state, relevant case regulation from another state may very well be thought of because of the court.

“Guaranteeing the precision of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple dependable sources is essential for reliable legal research.”

Reasonable grounds are offered about the record to connect the petitioner with the commission of the alleged offence. Nevertheless punishment of your alleged offence does not slide inside the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. yet realized Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising away from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is during the credit in the petitioner as accused, therefore, case with the petitioner falls from the exception where bail cannot be granted even in the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, advice has become sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion with the same is hereby reproduced:

Legislation professors traditionally have played a much smaller role in acquiring case legislation in common regulation than professors in civil legislation. Because court decisions in civil regulation traditions are historically brief[4] rather than formally amenable to establishing precedent, much from the exposition on the regulation in civil law traditions is finished by academics somewhat than by judges; this is called doctrine and may be published in treatises or in journals for example Recueil Dalloz in France. Historically, common law courts relied small on legal scholarship; Consequently, in the turn of your twentieth century, it was quite uncommon to view a tutorial writer quoted in the legal decision (apart from Probably for that educational writings of prominent judges such as Coke and Blackstone).

whether although granting promotion senior employees were viewed as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)

This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution might be justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears plus a new system is set in its place.

In some jurisdictions, case regulation could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.

To invoke section three hundred and 302 just because death has occurred is the most significant tragedy of all. It does the exact opposite of what a legal system is there to accomplish, i.e. safe its citizens.

This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right into a healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are not any specific provisions while in the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental law in Pakistan, it truly is important that the case established the application on the precautionary principle where there is often a threat to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations of your State in protecting the right to the clean and healthy environment.

P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to observe that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are entirely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case legislation titled as “Shah here Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it's been held by the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--